What is the main point that Drehle makes? Does the author of the student essay your are considering address that point? What do you think about his claims, especially in light of the quick poll that we took at the beginning of class? How does this affect the author's ethos (his or her integrity; how much faith we have in his argument)? How does this essay compare to Victor's essay?
Drehles main point is that summer enrichment programs end the problem of the summer slide, but with the economy the way it is they're aren't as many programs as we need. The students essay does address that point in some parts, but trails off in others. In my opinion the student's claims make sense, once you ask an older person they would say yes, but if you ask a younger child they would say no.